BP’s Sale of Key Pipeline to Billionaire is Bad for UK

0
58

The sale is the latest in a string of bad luck for BP. In 2005, BP was found to be chiefly responsible for the largest oil spill in history. In 2009, they suffered six platform disasters and in 2010 they were hit with a $25 billion fine-the largest in history for an environmental incident.

The purchase of the pipeline by CNOOC is a signal that China wants more control over exporting oil from Alberta’s oil sands. China has been aggressively trying to expand its interests overseas, mostly because it needs more resources to keep growing its economy. 

China has been importing more and more oil from repressive regimes like Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Iran. The Chinese government is one of the world’s primary censors of the internet. They also haven’t hesitated to use force in putting down democracy protests, such as what occurred in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

Though Mr. Harper’s Conservatives have been friendly to China, it does not seem that they can control what goes on in the Chinese business community. In December, CNOOC tried to buy a Canadian company, Nexen. But Ottawa put a stop to the deal because the takeover could have given Chinese state-owned companies too much control over Canada’s oil sands.

Canadian politicians are concerned about their country’s sovereignty, especially after the financial crisis showed that even some of the world’s largest economies could experience a serious recession and contagion. Mr. Harper has said he does not want Canada to become so dependent on China for its economy that it would be at risk if the Chinese economy collapsed.

Disclaimer:  The contents of this site, such as text, graphics, images, and other materials contained on the page are for general information purposes only. This article is not a substitute for professional advice on the topics mentioned. This article does not create any form of offers to any legal or professional service. The site assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the contents. In no event shall the site be liable for any special, direct, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages or any damages whatsoever, whether in an action to follow the content, negligence or other tort, arising out of the use of the contents of the article. The blog reserves the right to make additions, deletions, or modifications to the contents at any time without prior notice. The site does not warrant that the site is free of viruses or other harmful components. It may contain views and opinions which are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other author, agency, organization, employer or company, including the site itself. It also does not provide professional advice, diagnosis, treatment or any legal service. The site does not endorse official procedures, legal actions or qualified services and the use of its contents are solely at your own risk.

Previous articleSamsung Profit Set to Hit a high Thanks to Chips
Next articleEuropean Banks Sitting on “Mountain” of Bad Debt